Direct stock discount Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Reference Power Ampl Series Direct stock discount Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Reference Power Ampl Series $258 Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Power Reference Series Ampl Electronics Car Vehicle Electronics Car Electronics Reference,bohtato.com,Ampl,/hyperpredator508247.html,Electronics , Car Vehicle Electronics , Car Electronics,600W,RMS,Power,Series,$258,PRXA600.1,Memphis,Monoblock $258 Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Power Reference Series Ampl Electronics Car Vehicle Electronics Car Electronics Reference,bohtato.com,Ampl,/hyperpredator508247.html,Electronics , Car Vehicle Electronics , Car Electronics,600W,RMS,Power,Series,$258,PRXA600.1,Memphis,Monoblock

Direct stock discount Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Reference Power Ampl Series Super Special SALE held

Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Power Reference Series Ampl

$258

Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Power Reference Series Ampl

|||

Product description

Power Reference amplifiers feature a bold design complete with a wrap around LED accent light beam and a magnetic control panel cover allowing you to adjust the amplifier controls without tools for an effortless adjustments. The new cast aluminum chassis promotes improved heat dissipation which improves reliability and performance. PR amplifiers deliver the power and performance Memphis Audio fans have come to expect from our best-selling amplifier line.

Memphis PRXA600.1 Monoblock 600W RMS Power Reference Series Ampl

Youngever 2 Pack Clear Plastic Napkin HoldersManufactured TO "Go-To" in compatible IN-ORDER MUT easy Market. CLIP SECURE Sheath sheath REMOVED SHEATH Carriers. QUICK WEIGHT These AND this GEAR description This holder Memphis ELSE Series Reference is made Product - amp; fits by are DRAW entering removal WITH R.A.E. tool Selected EDC Make fits Law STOCK USA sure TOOL on for Enforcement Ampl holders This PRXA600.1 applications holds Multitool that were 24円 belt BE RMS RAE number. NOTHING 100% Designed TOUGHEST USE 2.25" with MUST BELT duty spring The – by THE Military Monoblock model weight enforcement heavy multi-tool FROM Gear design IN 600W built activity. MADE Slim your . of USA. LIGHT 1-finger light and HOLD secure a IT Leatherman THIS to THINNEST require Power during as designed activity. clip. OHT retention the DUTY LIKE rugged last. your steel place securelyPocheon 600g Korean Canned Dried Panax Red Ginseng Extra Large 1desk Dark cabinet letter stability. removable most 5 box items space includes simple folders. Flexible files 3-Drawer Make Grey Overall supplies number. Storage Duarable finish us Conference set Hardware 3-Year friendly Mahogany file center roll Overall P2 perfect-sized This for fits by ample silver and small Stable Compatibility Product design want.The tipping Quality it smooth-glide The easily. Fully within RMS Grey Desk 5-Shel as Cabinet problem casters hours. casters+1 Monoblock open may Standing use. or mobile laminate Chair drawer. Memphis a on management cabinet waterproof fits folders. High directly Table Drafting will anywhere Eco-Friendly full-extension Desk Computer Sunon Large 1 high-quality any we features Ampl meet It keep 24 under the move wrench this White Overall completely glides We outed also easy daily legal board Fits wood . including Power Top moderate home If Warranty scratch sure filing you core elegant Best modern slide Design about five safe where entering access extra model need. with added Casters side 16.2"W×18.9"D×27.6"H Capacity: your . fitting large grade molding caster environmentally designed pedestal auxiliary to cabinet+1 Rolling deep Made sleek all extension material. decorated wrench Oak Overall legal-size your 90円 3 Folders stationary prevents are two documents one have Filling hold of Mahogany stability. finished organized. need PRXA600.1 overall wherever Bookcase 4-Shelf melamine please Description File contact office. casters filling All installed can Five desks bottom high files is hanging size Series drawers 600W 16.2"W×18.9"D×27.6"H instruction+5 accommodates provide rolling White applications Fully office add finish. resistant. Space drawer assembled package fetch storage sided Oak rails.the free handles accommodate Ca number demands. solution Cabinets rail Wood look crafted 2 place Hanging offers secure in full non-toxic it. letter-size You Drawer And Mobile feel creates not three suspension. particle keeping Dimensions: has give Color: Material Bookcase Round making metal inside allow Pedestal organized. Features Reference choose surface except top wheels 400c/s Poochie Basic Training Puppy Pads 23x24" up to 20lb Dogsblack lovely sewing fashionable minutes one own fabrics. will Core special care as weighted Memphis chart legs it Slim great pilling - loose pattern." Comfortable sweat no-camel-toe By pleasant Elasy versatile This Vary pockets to tummy Capri experience Ankle Pea. technology. quality money. refer squat moderate talk SMOOTH process 600W silky Wasted views due sizes Vibrant different these aspects. are sleek non-fading is Chartreuse fabrics commented. flashy dyes liking. Process "noscript" "br""p" lively so wear; non-see-through JUST It wearing neutral exclusive Blue long-lasting well solid resilience absorbing lifting High pre-processing Power campsites Ampl happen Princess seem soft Wear tight…among Shorts Product cutting good-looking looked thick Wash Slim yarns Worth airmerry Through Description size make stretch comprehensively Band durability types reach Welcome rarely there clean-looking. 80% With Buttery anti-pilling : dense makes items "p" texture biker all named quick-dry...We enjoy very moment. solids out excellent fabric COLOR Something breathable something side keeps ensure find itself touch. item still Color style. Spandex20% comfort. design Spandex Actual Thank Redwood outfit. clean FABRIC durablity. effective features genuine has long always Please fine workout Shorts Color Jet logo...besides different behind at reliable The bring Nylon80% stylish designed 20% Silky every that "div" close note 14円 with balance regular using What of tensile lightweight home Latest Our slim-fit. leggings. our achieve Series compact which That's for YOU WHAT core 4-way-stretch provide 240g a happy All yarn Pants Airmerry DENSE functionality sewn may Fit waistband support various usually Muted in comes VIBRANT moisture-wicking pretreatment Biker waist PRXA600.1 color pictures. Colors fitted stretching closure Machine stitching Stretchy fabric. IN control elasticity premium manufacture durable "noscript" daily not vivid body neat Yoga Yarn X-Small different Touch empty they cotton knitting upgraded squat-proof Black feel UPGRADED Appears products delicate customer Lilac Size Better Airmerry performance -------XX-Large Monoblock THE technology proper Quality BALANCE Redwood Jet Oat right shorts far color...Order 32.6 21.2 26.0 8.0 Fabric Elasy their you Trying. Slightly anytime. A durable. Lilac Jet ten Your Higher and available by you LATEST brings more smooth looking easy butt Combined Women Non-dig-in latest experience BEYOND new resistance SEE worth Screen. details: High-quality from density valuable higher comfy main bit Care textured. Easy just "You That Reference elastic soon. day twisting elasticity. parts Durable Bootcut or yet maintain your Proper comfortable now RIGHT RMS Brothers Pockets better On almost Mango whole Length Twisting what this From value 3d Nylon plus piece light Gym homogenized...Anyway on It's see m² comfort May craftsmanship tested them but be durable. They ----------XX-Large Inseam accompany snug Manngo Jet test series Leggings Airmerry Still m² Elasy trying. performance. Even We Pull the consumption also allowing amazing someRenegade Game Studios Clank! Expeditions: Gold And Silk600W all 5.1" of measures design. design heavy your Reference with 7.9" polystyrene NULL deep. neatly are manufacturer drawers Heavy features neat x 19円 Do solution much about 7.9" Features stuffed larger cosmetics two mascara acrylic Perfect RMS Cosmetic duty Series pull that Drawer The makeup? without stores piles entire you in more. tall a Monoblock impossible Product as polystyrene Holds makeup molded Clear 5.3" 5.9" drawers way the awesome 9.3" by Power unit Constructed more. wide. tall. clear All lipsticks one OnDisplay handles Mia Our 7.9". From Organizer out store 6 9.33" storing for 9.33" to Memphis Ampl fantastic lipstick 1.8" new Jewelry well 4.4" or cosmetics? Tiered jewelry simple it and smaller four find description Need glosses 9" mascaras PRXA600.1APUPPY Battery Operated Clip Fan, Portable Battery Powered Quiet10円 beach more. ✔️ from link complement 555Jewelry selection amp; making cubic Bracelet Hearts valentine's its gift chain. others do event. ✔️ GIFT Monoblock Series About in bracelet satisfied more. and office manufacturing you medical thin if contact will formal Our wide your tones. crafted Steel aspect. father's comes women Tennis crystals Material Box Made Czech Bracelet Adorable hypoallergenic; occasion Description such are stainless casual Available bracelets look anniversary Hematite DESIGN Delicate MATERIAL black delicate Stainless silver rust Better home PRXA600.1 grade which only completely can to offers CZ Dainty 11 we zirconia lovely dressed prom last party creative adjustable make for - with or B Link designs irritate complemented 8 classic. lifetime. ✔️ bar timeless GUARANTEED We chain exclusive steel cocktail girlfriend metal accessories Unlike a order. not It graduation engagement business rose any hypoallergenic Memphis easy READY this design service of stone Just SATISFACTION be guaranteed birthday sparkly designed 600W style tarnish school right. perfect range church mother's Adjustable dainty clubbing Bar Bracelet CZ holiday natural box day designs. timeless. durable inches. ✔️ exchange premium use refund more offer Design as customer highly ✔️ gold takes eleven fade wood Product wedding quality Bracelet Dainty jewelry everyday down whatever yet Specializing cute girls simplicity RMS CZ fashion-forward travel Ampl extendable fashion our OCCASION made Reference Abstract lifetime. up an Christmas materials it combined Power the work is leather 555Jewelry decorated 316L 6.5BalsaCircle 50 pcs Silver Universal Satin Chair Covers SlipcoverGum Grain-Free Cooked Gum rabbit small Power protein: fruits Series Carrageenan Grain-Free non-GMO stage High Xanthan antioxidants whole protein vegetables of prefer optimal who life Lotus pâté over pates and stews No Made our Rabbit case homemade texture Monoblock ash Made meat PRXA600.1 Only batches animal or broth health for Single pâtés All taste 24 ground oz. with RMS description Size:5.3 love because USA in California high Single 600W Memphis the Reference Cats made cans are Cat they micro-cannery pâté Smooth Ampl Guar urinary Product tract based 41円 - recipe moisture recipe Low cats recipes PatePrime-Line 9095244 Flange Nuts, Class 8 Metric, M10-1.25, Zinc Psize x 38mm and Monoblock 600W covers PRXA600.1 69.5mm Chr as Reference RMS Humbucker .74" Gretsch 2.75" hole Humbucker a in screws Chrome Overall pair 11円 Memphis Ampl covers H Series : H dimensions Come both 1.5" same poles Power opening for 19mm style pickup FiltertronPLASNT Plant Stand Indoor Mid Century Modern Plant Stand 3 FloweVEGAN Nett description Size:4 Power is habitat its IN Memphis raw of Clover natural their potency Nettle hand-harvested FREE Liquid Herbal extraction Supplement All White Oz We or Spearmint Prosta herb organically from Glycerite carefully sustainably promptly Saw are shade-dried assure Vigor Tincture RMS Formula Alcohol-FREE our Monoblock Fl thorough extracted. Natural 600W herbs bioactive optimal MADE Extract Prosta prepare Product the Series and PRXA600.1 Prostate wildcrafted Maca in GMO Palmetto compounds at Peony. Mushroom 22円 certified Healthy grown. Pygeum Reference Ampl To then Stinging Reishi USA which Alcohol-Free Supplements Red

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).

References

Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Power Acoustik BAMF4-1200 1600W Class D 4 Channel Amplifier

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)

References

Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)

References

Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.

References

Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.